Years ago, in a fit of ambition I have never fully explained to myself, I joined a rugby team. At my first practice, a teammate sized me up — a fellow American, obviously raised on face masks and NFL glory — and offered a piece of orientation I have never forgotten. Rugby, he said, is more like wrestling than it is like football.

I didn't believe him at first. From the sideline it looked exactly like football with the pads off, a never-ending punt return, which is to say it looked like a dare. I was emboldened; I had watched enough football to assume it qualified me for something.

It qualified me to be tackled by a real-life Irishman. Let me tell you: it hurts.

But my teammate was right, and the reason he was right is the whole subject of this essay. When you take away the pads, the body imposes its own rulebook. Two large men cannot run at each other at full speed, over and over, and both expect to stand up afterward. So the game bends around that fact. Tacklers wrap instead of launch. Runners angle instead of ram. The geometry of the sport — the phases, the rucks, the way space collapses around the ball — means that most collisions happen before anyone has reached full speed. What's left when the violence is governed is form: leverage, grip, body position, the patient work of bringing a man to the ground and holding him there. Wrestling. The sport had quietly adapted itself to what human bodies could actually bear, and the adaptation wasn't a compromise. It was the game.

It would have to be that way, because rugby itself began as an adaptation, at least in lore. The story — carved into a stone at Rugby School in England — is that in 1823, during a schoolboy match of football, the kicking kind, a young man named William Webb Ellis showed "a fine disregard for the rules," caught the ball in his arms, and ran with it. Historians will tell you the tale is almost certainly embellished, a legend probably assembled after the fact by the school’s opportunistic admissions committee. It doesn't matter. The World Cup trophy bears his name anyway, because the legend records something true even if the afternoon never happened: rugby exists because somebody, or a whole generation of somebodies, was playing the game as given and decided it would be more fun to pick the dang thing up and run. That's the culture of rugby in a nutshell, as I came to learn.

Ellis' modification got modified. Americans took rugby, and a Yale man named Walter Camp replaced the scrum with a line of scrimmage and invented the system of downs, and out came American football, the far-less-kicking kind. Football added leather helmets, then plastic ones, then a full-on exoskeleton — and here the story turns wry, because armor has a way of becoming license. The better the protection got, the harder the collisions it permitted. The pads didn't remove the violence my rugby teammate was talking about; they underwrote it. So when the Second World War arrived and commanding officers on American bases needed their men fit, competitive, and unbroken, they performed the next adaptation in the lineage: they kept the routes and the timing and the deception and stripped the tackling out entirely. Nobody thought they were founding a sport. They were solving a problem — how to let soldiers hit the field without the infirmary — and the solution outlived the war.

Eighty years later, that wartime improvisation is having its moment. Flag football is the fastest-growing girls' high school sport in the country, sanctioned by new states seemingly every season. The NFL turned its own all-star game into a flag game. In 2028 it will be played at the Olympics. And on Saturday mornings all over America, kids who might have spent a tackle practice learning to absorb contact are instead doing the thing every one of us actually fell in love with in the backyard: throw it, catch it, make somebody miss. A game that hung a not for you sign in front of half the population for a century now says come on, and the girls came.

Let me be plain about something, because it matters to me. I love tackle football. I love the history and the culture and the sound a stadium makes on a cold December night, and I will be watching the Steelers this Sunday with a seriousness I usually reserve for my actual profession. Tackle is its own thing, magnificent at the scale it's played, and nothing here is an argument against it, though I hope that it too learns to adapt to protect the health of its players. That's the point worth being precise about: the adapted version of a game is not an indictment of the original. It's a different tool for a different situation, and you're allowed to love both.

Tennis and pickleball are the same story wearing different shoes. In the summer of 1965, on Bainbridge Island in Washington, a couple of fathers came home to bored kids, a badminton court, and not enough rackets to go around. So they grabbed ping-pong paddles and a perforated plastic ball, lowered the net, and made up rules the whole family could play by. They weren't trying to found what would become the fastest-growing sport in America. They were trying to rescue a Saturday afternoon. They adapted the traditional to their equipment, their yard, their kids — to themselves and their situation — and sixty years later the courts are everywhere and the purists are still sputtering, mostly about the noise. These are the same spectators, mind you, who sit in reverent silence through grunting that sounds like two people exhaling their last breaths on earth, then call the local HOA about a wiffle ball.

Once you see the pattern, it's everywhere. Softball is baseball adapted to a Chicago winter and an indoor gymnasium. Ultimate frisbee is what happens when high schoolers have a parking lot and no varsity letter to chase. Beach volleyball, three-on-three basketball, par-three golf, pond hockey played on whatever frozen surface the week provides. The list is endless, because the impulse is endless.

And here is the thing the purists miss, the thing my rugby teammate was really teaching me. Every traditional form was once itself the modification. The way it's supposed to be done is just the way somebody once adapted it — and that adaptation happened to stick, and gather rules, and acquire referees, and calcify into reverence. Tradition, in sport and nearly everywhere else, is mostly successful improvisation that stuck around long enough to be defended. Which means that when you modify an activity to fit your life, you are not betraying the tradition. You are participating in the oldest tradition there is.

That's worth carrying well beyond the field. Somewhere in your life, I'd wager, is a thing you set down because you couldn't do it properly. The piano that went silent when the lessons ended, as if the instrument required a recital to justify itself. The nine holes at twilight you skip because a real golfer plays eighteen. The running you quit because you were never going to race. The bicycle you don't ride because you weren't prepared to commit to the spandex. The official form of these things is scaffolding — it was built up around the joy, not the other way around — and scaffolding can be rebuilt to fit the person actually standing there. The question is never whether you're doing it the way it's supposed to be done. The question is what you wanted from the thing in the first place, and what's standing between you and that, and whether you're willing to move it.

Somebody will tell you it doesn't count. Somebody told the soldiers, and the dads on Bainbridge Island, and every schoolboy who ever preferred the game in his head to the game on the field. I think of Webb Ellis, apocryphal as he probably is: a boy in the middle of a match, realizing the game as given was not the game he wanted — and the whole future of sport pivoting on what he did next.

Pick up the ball and run.

John

The Mayfly Letter has no algorithms, no investors—just my wife and me folding newspapers at a kitchen table.

We're a small-batch operation built on the support of readers who have signed up to receive our handsome print edition— four essays, inked on premium English newsprint and sent to your doorstep every month.

If you're the kind of person who loves the feeling of picking up a real newspaper with your morning coffee, something you can underline and leave out for others to find, we'd love to have you as a print subscriber.

It’s the best way to support our independent writing.

Either way, thanks for being here.

John Conrad